 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, January 11, 2006 |
 |
|


Families of deported Cubans challenge US landing rule
Christopher G. Anderson on January 11, 2006 3:08 PM ET

[JURIST] The families of fifteen Cubans deported when they failed to reach US soil have filed suit in US District Court, claiming that the US government's so-called "wet-foot, dry-foot" policy is inconsistent with US and international law. The fifteen Cubans fled their homeland in a small homemade boat, but only managed to reach an abandoned bridge piling in the Florida Keys. Because the bridge was no longer attached to US soil, the Cubans were sent back to Cuba on Monday [AP report] aboard a Coast Guard cutter. Under the current "wet-foot, dry-foot" policy, Cubans who reach US soil are allowed to remain in the United States, while those stopped at sea are sent back to Cuba by the US Coast Guard [official website]. Critics of the policy point out that the federal government's jurisdiction extends beyond dry land to waters as far out as 100 miles. On Monday, Senator Mel Martinez (R-FL) called [press release] the "wet foot, dry foot" rule "complete and utter failure": Because they reached an old bridge and not a new bridge there's a judgment they didn't reach American soil? The semantics used to return these men and women -- who have risked so much to reach freedom and are now returned to an uncertain future -- are an embarrassment. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Spanish prosecutor charges Argentine naval officer with genocide
Krystal MacIntyre on January 11, 2006 1:42 PM ET

[JURIST] Spanish authorities have charged former Argentine naval officer Ricardo Miguel Cavallo [TrialWatch profile] with genocide for his involvement in the disappearance of hundreds of people during a 1976 Argentine military coup. Papers published Wednesday allege that between 20,000 and 30,000 people were forcibly kidnapped or "disappeared" following the takeover, including approximately 600 Spanish citizens. Just under 9,000 poeple were killed. Cavallo faces counts ranging from genocide, organized terrorism and crimes against humanity to murder. If convicted, he faces a prison term theoretically amounting to 17,000 years. The case is expected to go to trial later this year. In April 2005 a Spanish court convicted another former Argentine naval officer [JURIST report], Adolfo Scilingo, of crimes against humanity and sentenced him to 640 years in prison after finding him to have been aboard planes from which 30 people were thrown to their deaths during Argentina's military rule from 1976 to 1983. That case was the first in Spain under a new law that allows the country to prosecute for crimes committed in other countries under the principle of universal jurisdiction [Amnesty backgrounder], upheld in September by a ruling of Spain's Constitutional Court [official website]. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Alito faces more questions as confirmation hearings resume
Jeannie Shawl on January 11, 2006 8:18 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] enters its third day of confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Samuel Alito [official profile] Wednesday morning with more questions scheduled from senators. On Tuesday, Alito parried questions on abortion and wiretaps [JURIST report], facing a stiff interrogation [Washington Post transcript] from Sen. Edward Kennedy on executive power. Saying that Alito's record indicated he had "been overly deferential to executive power, whether exercised by the president, the attorney general or law enforcement officials," Kennedy expressed doubts [Washington Post report] about President Bush's authority to bypass the newly-passed McCain Amendment ban on torture in a signing statement [JURIST document]. Alito said that the president cannot override a constitutional statute, but refused to address specific questions about the Amendment. Queried later on the role of foreign law, Alito said that that did not aid in constitutional interpretation but could be useful in some cases. Asked about his involvement in a Princeton alumni group described by Democratic senators as opposing the admission of women and minorities to the school, Alito replied that he had no specific memory of the organization, which he listed on a 1985 job application for the Reagan administration, and said that he had not been actively involved. The Los Angeles Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|