 |
|

Legal news from Wednesday, January 4, 2006 |
 |
|


Interest groups clash as Alito hearings approach
Joshua Pantesco on January 4, 2006 4:35 PM ET

[JURIST] With Senate confirmation hearings for US Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito [JURIST news archive] scheduled to begin Monday [JURIST report], more interest groups and other organizations are voicing their views on the nomination. The Alliance for Justice [advocacy website] released a 168 page report [PDF] Wednesday chronicling Alito's decision-making history, concluding that his opinions would "drive the Supreme Court sharply to the right." Other liberal groups, including the AFL-CIO and the NAACP, announced [JURIST report] Tuesday that they are preparing a series of television ads critical of Alito's credibility and integrity. In contrast, a group of appellate attorneys, former DOJ prosecutors, and law professors have signed a letter [PDF] in praise of his "fair, thoughtful, and rigorous opinions."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ Supreme Court orders Padilla transfer to civilian custody
Jeannie Shawl on January 4, 2006 4:21 PM ET

[JURIST] AP is reporting that the US Supreme Court has ordered that Jose Padilla [JURIST news archive] be transferred from military to civilian custody. Padilla was detained over three years ago for allegedly planning to detonate a radioactive "dirty bomb" in the US, but was not charged until November 2005, when he was indicted [JURIST report] on 11 unrelated counts, including conspiracy to murder US nationals and providing material support to terrorists. The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in December denied the Bush administration's request [JURIST report] to transfer Padilla to civilian custody for purposes of his prosecution, and the Department of Justice appealed [JURIST report] the decision [PDF text] to the Supreme Court, saying the appeals court had usurped the President's authority to direct the war on terror.
4:33 PM ET - Though the Supreme Court overruled the Fourth Circuit on the transfer decision, justices have not yet decided whether to hear Padilla's challenge to his detention in military custody. Before being charged, Padilla had challenged his indefinite detention as a military combatant. The Fourth Circuit ruled [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] in September 2005 that Padilla could be held without charge indefinitely. The decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court [JURIST report], but a decision on certiorari has not yet been made. AP has more.
6:30 PM ET - The Supreme Court's one-page order on transfer, describing the procedural context but giving no reasons, is now online here [PDF].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Abramoff pleads guilty to fraud, conspiracy charges
Joshua Pantesco on January 4, 2006 1:38 PM ET

[JURIST] As anticipated [JURIST report], former Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff on Wednesday [JURIST news archive] pleaded guilty [DOJ press release] in federal court in Florida to two conspiracy and fraud charges stemming from the 2000 purchase of the SunCruz Casino [corporate website] by Abramoff and partners. Abramoff initially pleaded guilty [JURIST report; DOJ press release] to the charges in August, but after the DOJ investigation revealed more connections [JURIST report] between Abramoff and public officials than anticipated, he negotiated a plea agreement [PDF text] with federal prosecutors that would reduce his punishment in exchange for favorable testimony in future DOJ corruption cases. His plea bargain calls for a maximum seven-year sentence, to be reduced depending on the quality of information he produces regarding his dealings with members of Congress, and would run concurrently with the sentence he receives in connection with Tuesday's guilty plea [JURIST report] on separate charges. The DOJ is reportedly investigating Abramoff's ties with former house majority leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) [official website; JURIST news archive], Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH) [official website], Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA) [official website], Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT) [official website], 17 current and former congressional aides, and two former Bush administration officials in the Interior Department and government procurement office. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush reserves right to bypass torture ban in spending bill signing statement
Joshua Pantesco on January 4, 2006 1:26 PM ET

[JURIST] A statement [JURIST document] made by President Bush when he signed the 2006 defense spending bill [JURIST report] last week allows Bush to bypass the law's ban on torture under his commander in chief powers, the Boston Globe reported Wednesday. A senior administration official told the Globe that Bush's comments could be used to justify the torture of a terror detainee under extreme circumstances, such as a "ticking bomb" scenario. The spending bill contains the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, which incorporates the so-called McCain Amendment [JURIST document] banning the cruel and inhumane treatment of detainees and the so-called Graham-Levin Amendment [JURIST document], limiting habeas jurisdiction for claims by enemy combatants. In his signing statement, a routine document that explains the President's interpretation of new law, Bush said: The executive branch shall construe Title X in Division A of the Act, relating to detainees, in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the President to supervise the unitary executive branch and as Commander in Chief and consistent with the constitutional limitations on the judicial power, which will assist in achieving the shared objective of the Congress and the President, evidenced in Title X, of protecting the American people from further terrorist attacks. Further, in light of the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2001 in Alexander v. Sandoval, and noting that the text and structure of Title X do not create a private right of action to enforce Title X, the executive branch shall construe Title X not to create a private right of action. The official who talked to the Globe explained that the administration considers the McCain Amendment to be good law [JURIST report], but that Bush meant to reserve the right to use harsher methods if national security was at stake. The official was quoted as saying that "the president has the obligation to follow this law, [but] he also has the obligation to defend and protect the country as the commander in chief, and he will have to square those two responsibilities in each case." Wednesday's Boston Globe has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ethiopia election protesters challenge court jurisdiction
Katerina Ossenova on January 4, 2006 12:51 PM ET

[JURIST] A group of Ethiopian opposition members charged with treason, inciting violence and genocide appeared in court Wednesday, challenging the court's authority to hear their case, but Federal Court Judge Adil Ahmed ordered the case to proceed after denying the defendants bail. 131 opposition politicians, reporters, and aid workers were arrested after street protests in July and November over parliamentary elections left 82 dead. The riots erupted during a protest against ballot fraud, organized by the Coalition of Unity and Democracy (CUD) [official website], Ethiopia's largest opposition party. CUD claims that the Ethiopian Peoples Revolutionary Democratic Front rigged the vote and intimidated witnesses, a claim supported [JURIST report] by the European Union Election Observation Mission to Ethiopia 2005 [official website]. The opposition members have also been barred from meeting with their defense lawyers [JURIST report] and appeared without them in court. Under Ethiopian law, the sentence for the charge of treason is the death penalty. Adil adjourned the case until February 23 and ordered that defense lawyers be provided to those who could not afford them. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Rhode Island legalizes medical marijuana with veto override
Joshua Pantesco on January 4, 2006 11:49 AM ET

[JURIST] The Rhode Island House of Representatives voted [RI press release] 59-13 on Tuesday in favor of overriding the veto of Gov. Don Carcieri [official website] of a bill [text] legalizing the prescription of marijuana to seriously ill patients. The law, effective immediately, allows critically ill people to grow as many as 12 plants, or to purchase as much as 2.5 ounces of marijuana, with a doctor's permission as needed to treat their symptoms. Though advocates say the bill is good news for AIDS and cancer patients, Carcieri cautioned that the bill fails to provide legal users with legal sources of the drug, and potentially exposes Rhode Island citizens to federal convictions. The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision last June in Gonzales v. Raich [Duke Law backgrounder; text] that validated the power of Congress to criminalize the use and growth of medical marijuana for medical reasons with a doctor's approval, citing a broad reading of the commerce clause in support of its decision. Ten other states - Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont and Washington - have also legalized medical marijuana [JURIST news archive]. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

NSA expanded domestic surveillance after Sept. 11 without formal OK from Bush
Jeannie Shawl on January 4, 2006 9:17 AM ET

[JURIST] In the weeks following the Sept. 11 attacks, the National Security Agency [official website] expanded its domestic surveillance [JURIST news archive] program without formal authorization from President Bush, documents released Tuesday revealed. According to an October 2001 letter [text] released by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi [official website], after being briefed with other members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committees Pelosi expressed concern [AP report] to Lt. Gen. Michael Hayden, then director of the NSA, over the agency's legal authority to conduct expanded domestic eavesdropping to identify terror suspects in the US. Pelosi wrote to Hayden: During your appearance before the committee on October 1, you indicated that you had been operating since the September 11 attacks with an expansive view of your authorities with respect to the conduct of electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and related statutes, orders, regulations, and guidelines. ...
... I am concerned whether, and to what extent, the National Security Agency has received specific presidential authorization for the operations you are conducting. Until I understand better the legal analysis regarding the sufficiency of the authority which underlies your decision on the appropriate way to proceed on this matter, I will continue to be concerned. Hayden replied that in the briefing he had been "attempting to emphasize that I used my authorities to adjust NSA's collection and reporting." An administration spokeswoman said Tuesday that Hayden had acted under the authority of a Reagan-era Executive Order [EO 12333 text], which set guidelines for intelligence gathering. The NSA further expanded its domestic surveillance under a 2002 executive order that specifically authorized the wiretapping of international communications [JURIST report] that originated within the US by people believed to be connected to al Qaeda or other terrorist organizations. Wednesday's New York Times has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|