 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, December 22, 2005 |
 |
|


FISC judges to be briefed on NSA warrantless eavesdropping tactics
Joshua Pantesco on December 22, 2005 1:28 PM ET

[JURIST] The presiding judge of the 11-member Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) [constituitive statute], the secret court charged with overseeing government espionage activities, has organized a classified briefing for panel members to allow administration representatives to report on the scope of the recently uncovered [JURIST report] National Security Agency (NSA) [official website] secret eavesdropping program. According to the New York Times report that broke the story, a 2002 presidential order authorized the NSA to secretly monitor international phone calls and emails of possibly thousands of US citizens without warrants. US District Judge James Robertson [official profile], one of the 11 FISC judges, resigned [JURIST report] earlier this week in protest over the President's eavesdropping plan. Most of the judges learned about the program through the Times article, and most agree that they need to hear the administration's legal justification for the eavesdropping in order to confirm the reliability and credibility of the information received by the court. The purpose of the FISC is to authorize surveillance requested by the Justice Department of espionage and terrorism suspects within the US. Under statute, the Justice Department bears the burden of showing probable cause that all surveillance targets are in fact foreign governments or their agents, but an emergency provision allows for warrantless eavesdropping for up to 72 hours if the attorney general certifies that eavesdropping is the only tactic available to the government to access the information. Bush argued Monday, and was supported [press briefing text] by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, that the need to detect terrorist threats quickly and effectively allows the NSA to circumvent the FISA system, as the emphasis of the NSA program is threat detection, not monitoring known targets. Thursday's Washington Post has more.
Previously in JURIST's Paper Chase...


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Court rules UK rights law bars UK troops from abusing Iraqi prisoners
Joshua Pantesco on December 22, 2005 12:19 PM ET

[JURIST] A British appellate court has ruled [opinion summary; full text] Thursday that British soldiers in Iraq are forbidden to subject Iraqi prisoners to cruel or degrading treatment while in their custody. The determination that the Human Rights Act [text] - a 1998 statute encating the European Convention on Human Rights into English law - applies to any British troop with control over a detainee overturns a High Court decision from last year that restricted the proper application of the act to detainees held in British prisons. The court held Wednesday, however, that the defendant soldiers did not violate the act when an Iraqi detainee, Baha Mousa, died in their custody, based on the given evidence, but authorized an independent inquiry into the incident. It has been alleged [Guardian article] that Mousa was kicked to death by British troops while in custody. The decision reasoned that "it could be difficult for a European government to decide to pursue policies that treated human life as more readily expendable just because those whom their forces kill are not themselves European." The UK Ministry of Defense (MoD) [official website] argued that the Human Rights Act was intended to protect European citizens, not Iraqis, and that its application in a combat zone would place too many restrictions on British soldiers, limiting their effectiveness. One judge also issued a harsh condemnation of the MoD's handling of the investigation of the incident, saying that "if international standards are to be observed, the task of investigating incidents in which a human life is taken by British forces must be completely taken away from the military chain of command and vested in the Royal Military police." The Guardian has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Australian charged with sending text messages to incite riot
Joshua Pantesco on December 22, 2005 12:15 PM ET

[JURIST] Australian police have arrested a 33-year-old man for using text messages to incite rioting a week after race riots broke out in Sydney [JURIST report] involving 5,000 people, mostly white men and youths, attacking Muslim residents on local beaches. Wednesday's arrest marks the first instance someone has been charged with such an offense. The man allegedly forwarded two text messages repeatedly to other phones requesting that others meet him at the beach. He was charged [AAP report] with "using a carriage service to menace, harass or cause offense," a crime whose enforcement was strengthened by legislation [JURIST report; PDF text] passed last week in response to the attacks. Under the new laws, police are permitted to seize mobile phones, ban alcohol, set up roadblocks and search vehicles to prevent or control public disorder. From Australia, the Sydney Morning Herald has local coverage.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|