UN summit talks break down over human rights, management reform differences

[JURIST] Intensive talks directed at salvaging a consensus draft document for the 2005 United Nations World Summit [official website] broke down Monday over differences on human rights and management reform, according to a spokesman for the US UN mission [official website]. Rick Grenell said that Egypt, China, Russia, and Pakistan have objected to a US-supported requirement of a two-thirds majority vote of the UN General Assembly to select a member of the new human rights council. The four countries are instead lobbying for a simple majority vote, and also disagree with the council becoming a permanent aspect of the UN. The proposed reforms to the standing Human Rights Commission were prompted by allegations that that body is run by countries with a history of abuse and driven by political bargaining which does not allow effective action on human rights. Grenell said that management reforms were also a major point of difference, with the US supporting more management powers being shifted to the Secrtary-General's office, and away from the General Assembly. Secretary-General Kofi Annan himself invoked a sense of urgency over the state of the summit document Monday, and encouraged all parties involved to continue negotiations [UN news report] AFP has more.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.