 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, September 22, 2005 |
 |
|


States brief ~ FL Supreme Court rules gun makers' insurance will not cover lawsuits
Rachel Felton on September 22, 2005 6:30 PM ET

[JURIST] Leading Thursday's states brief, the Florida Supreme Court ruled [PDF text] today that gun makers, sued by cities and counties seeking to recover the costs of providing services for gun-related violence, are not covered by their commercial liability insurance policies. The court found the gun makers' insurance policies excluded property damage and injuries occurring away from the gun makers' premises and resulting from a product not in their physical control. Taurus International Holdings and Taurus International Manufacturing Inc. [corporate website] sought to have their insurers defend several suits filed against them by cities across the nation. AP has more.
In other state legal news... - New Mexico State Treasurer Robert Vigil announced Thursday that he will temporarily step down while federal charges [JURIST report] for an illegal kickback scheme are resolved. Governor Bill Richardson [Governor's press release, PDF] and Attorney General Patricia Madrid filed a petition with the state supreme court asking for Vigil to receive pay during the period and for Richardson to appoint an acting treasurer. A joint-statement released by the two stated "New Mexicans should remember that under the law State Treasurer Robert Vigil [official website] is entitled to due process and the treasurer is presumed innocent unless proven guilty." New Mexico's Albuquerque Tribune has local coverage
- Several groups have filed a brief with the Florida Supreme Court challenging a proposed constitutional amendment, currently under the required consideration of the court, that would ban same-sex marriages. The Florida ACLU [ACLU press release], a government employees union, Equality Florida and 6 same-sex couples argue in the brief that the proposal violates the single subject requirement of the state constitution, and that it misleads voters. John Stemberger, chairman of Florida4Marriage.org [advocacy website], said the proposal clearly deals with one issue. The organization currently has 82,407 of the required 611,009 signatures needed to place the amendment on the November 2006 ballot. Florida's St. Petersburg Times has local coverage
- An Oregon appeals court has ruled [text] that a father's visitation rights can be restricted to accommodate the custodial parent's religion. The court moved the father's alternate weekend visitation from beginning on Friday evening to Saturday evening, because the child and her mother observe Sabbath from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday. Applying the child's best interest standard, the court found, "The infringement on the father's opportunity to develop what he has termed a traditional family relationship with child must yield to the stability and continuity afforded to child by mother's position." The ruling overturned a lower court decision. AP has more


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ Senate Judiciary Committee approves Roberts nomination
Holly Manges Jones on September 22, 2005 12:55 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Senate Judiciary Committee has approved the nomination of Judge John Roberts [JURIST news archive] as Chief Justice of the United States by a vote of 13-5 with all Republican members voting for and five Democrats voting against. Earlier this week, Roberts received an endorsement [JURIST report] from Sen. Arlen Specter, chair of the Judiciary Committee, and also received support [JURIST report] from Sen. Patrick Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the committee. Roberts' nomination will now go before the entire US Senate for a final confirmation vote.
8:45 PM ET - The five committee Democrats voting against the recommendation were Senators Joe Biden [committee statement], Richard Durbin, Dianne Feinstein [committee statement], Ted Kennedy [committee statement], and Charles Schumer [committee statement]. Kennedy said: We examined the only written record before us and saw John Roberts, aggressive activist in the Reagan Administration, eager to narrow hard-won rights and liberties, especially voting rights, women's rights, civil rights, and disability rights. As Congressman John Lewis eloquently stated in our hearings, 25 years ago John Roberts was on the wrong side of the nation's struggle to achieve genuine equality of opportunity for all Americans. And, despite many invitations to do so, Roberts never distanced himself from the aggressively narrow views of that young lawyer in the Reagan Administration....
Based on the record available, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that Judge Roberts's view of the rule of law would include as paramount the protection of basic rights. The values and perspectives displayed over and over again in his record cast doubt on his view of voting rights, women's rights, civil rights, and disability rights.
In fact, for all the hoopla and razzle-dazzle in four days of hearings, there is precious little in the record to suggest that a Chief Justice John Roberts would espouse anything less that the narrow and cramped view that staff attorney John Roberts so strongly advocated in the 1980s. Three Democrats supported Roberts' nomination: Russ Feingold [committee statement], Herb Kohl and, as indicated above, Patrick Leahy [committee statement]. The San Francisco Chronicle has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

ICTY to hold joint trial for nine suspects in Srebrenica massacre
Holly Manges Jones on September 22, 2005 11:15 AM ET

[JURIST] The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website] said Thursday that it will combine the cases of nine Bosnian Serb military officers [ICTY press release; PDF decision] accused of participating in the Srebrenica massacre [Wikipedia backgrounder] that resulted in the murders of nearly 8,000 Muslim men and boys. The massacre, which the UN-backed war crimes tribunal has ruled a genocide, was committed ten years ago during the Bosnian war by Bosnian Serb officers under the rule of former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic [Wikipedia profile; JURIST news archive], who is currently on trial at the ICTY for multiple charges, including the Srebrenica massacre. The charges against the nine accused men include genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Eight of the nine men are currently in custody while the last has said he will surrender himself to the court. The joint trial, expected to begin in 2006, will be the largest tried before the ICTY to date. AFP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

New charges filed in Afghan prisoner abuse investigation
Holly Manges Jones on September 22, 2005 10:28 AM ET

[JURIST] Two US Army soldiers have been charged with prisoner abuse in an ongoing investigation into the deaths of two Afghan prisoners while in US custody, which has already led to charges being filed against 14 soldiers, the military said Wednesday. Both Sgt. Alan J. Driver and Spc. Nathan Adam Jones have been charged with assault and maltreatment, while Jones also faces allegations that he made a falsified official statement. The two Afghan prisoners, known as Habibullah and Dilawar [Wikipedia profiles], were taken into US custody in December 2002 and died shortly after their arrests at the Bagram Airfield [Global Security profile] detention facility in Afghanistan. Of the 14 soldiers charged in the investigation into the abuse, three soldiers were charged last week, one has been convicted, four have pleaded guilty, two have been acquitted of charges, and another has announced his intention to enter a guilty plea. AP has more.
Previously in JURIST's Paper Chase...


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iraqi constitution could allow religious discrimination, Christian leaders warn
Chris Buell on September 22, 2005 7:50 AM ET

[JURIST] Christian leaders in Iraq have warned officials that the draft constitution [English translation; JURIST news archive] "opens the door widely" to discrimination of religious minorities in the country. Patriarch Emmanuel III Delly of the Chaldeans [Wikipedia backgrounder] met with the Iraqi president and prime minister earlier this week and said that certain parts of the draft constitution were contradictory. In particular, Delly pointed to Articles 2.1(b) and 2.2 of the text, which promise religious rights and freedom, compared to Article 2.1(a), which forbids laws that are inconsistent with the rules of Islam. Christian leaders have warned that the latter provision could allow the passage of discriminatory laws and urged an amendment to the draft. Minorities have previously expressed concern [JURIST report] with the draft. A referendum on the constitution is planned for Oct. 15. Zenit.org has more.
In a related story, Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari [Wikipedia profile] told the UN Security Council on Wednesday that the government expected insurgents to attempt to disrupt the Oct. 15 referendum and that the coming months could be determinative for the country's democratic future. He urged the UN to take a larger role in the constitutional referendum and December elections, through increased funding and security efforts. Echoing UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan's calls for a more transparent constitutional process [JURIST report], UN Special Envoy to Iraq Ashraf Qazi told the Council that restoring an inclusive, participatory political process remains a challenge. Qazi also said the UN is encouraging the Iraqi government "to step up its efforts to promote and protect human rights." The UN has a news release on the meeting. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Lawyers request federal judge to oversee Gitmo hunger strike
Chris Buell on September 22, 2005 7:08 AM ET

[JURIST] Expressing concern over the condition of Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees participating in a hunger strike, attorneys for some of the detainees have told District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly that the detainees are in worse condition than the military has admitted and asked the judge to oversee the military's management [New York Times report] of the hunger strike. Attorneys Tom Wilner and Kristine Huskey said Wednesday that they had visited five of their clients who were participating in the hunger strike [JURIST report], and that at least two of them were being force fed. The detainees, many of whom were arrested by US forces in 2002 in Afghanistan, are protesting their continued imprisonment without charge or trial, and the five visited by Wilner and Huskey said they would starve themselves to death unless they were released or charged. The military has reported that the number participating in the strike has dropped to 36 from a high of 131, and that all of them were in stable condition. Attorneys said, however, that two detainees who were being force fed, Fawzi al Odah [Project Kuwaiti Freedom profile] and Abdullah al Kandari [Cageprisoners profile], could barely sit up or talk. AP has more.
Previously in JURIST's Paper Chase...


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|