Stevens calls two controversial Supreme Court decisions "unwise" Holly Manges Jones at 9:40 AM ET
[JURIST] US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens [Wikipedia profile] has continued to candidly voice his opinions by calling the outcomes of two prominent cases decided by the Supreme Court this term "unwise" while speaking at a bar association meeting in Las Vegas. Justice Stevens wrote the majority opinions in the Kelo v. New London [JURIST report; opinion], which allowed the government to take private homes for public use, and in the Gonzales v. Raich [JURIST report; opinion], which enforced the federal government's narcotics laws over California's medical marijuana plan. Justice Stevens said in both cases he "was convinced that the law compelled a result that I would have opposed if I were a legislator" but despite his personal opinions, Stevens said the US Constitution allowed the resulting decisions. Earlier this month, Justice Stevens also spoke [text] at the annual meeting of the American Bar Association [group website] to offer his opinion on flaws in the current death penalty system [JURIST report]. The New York Times has more.
Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.