 |
|

Legal news from Friday, August 12, 2005 |
 |
|


EDITORS WANTED ~ Research, write legal news in real time...
Bernard Hibbitts on August 12, 2005 3:12 PM ET

[JURIST] JURIST is looking for talented, public-service oriented law students from law schools in the US and abroad to join our team of real-time legal news editors this fall.
From Los Angeles to London, from Chicago to Cairo - if you're a law student looking for intensive research, writing and editing experience and your own byline on a high-profile, mass-audience, volunteer-driven project dedicated to increasing awareness of important national and international legal issues, we may have a position for you!
In particular, we're looking for good writers, skilled Net surfers and fluent English-speakers with a nose for news who can spare at least 10 hours a week - weekdays, evenings and/or weekends - during the law school term to work online with members of our Pittsburgh-based law student staff who power JURIST's Paper Chase legal news weblog every day. Journalistic experience is helpful, but certainly not a prerequisite. Report on the latest legal news in your geographical area, or in your own area of interest. Learn the latest law that matters, make friends across the country and around the world, and gain valuable career and computer skills, all at the same time.
Interested? To apply for an online audition as a JURIST legal news editor, e-mail JURIST@law.pitt.edu
The limited number of JURIST editorial positions will fill up fast with the start of the fall law school term. Applications are already coming in from law students across the country, so contact us now!


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Ex-Klansman granted bail in 1964 civil rights murder case
Tom Henry on August 12, 2005 3:06 PM ET

[JURIST] Mississippi Judge Marcus Gordon on Friday granted bail to former Ku Klux Klansman Edgar Ray Killen [JURIST news archive], who, in June, was sentenced to 60 years in prison [JURIST report] for the 1964 killings of three civil rights workers. Gordon granted Killen's release on bond of $600,000 after determining through testimony that Killen, who is 80 and wheelchair bound, was neither a flight risk nor a danger to the public while his appeal is pending. Killen was found at trial to have organized a group to kidnap, assault, and shoot Michael Schwerner, Andrew Goodman and James Chaney. The three had just arrived in Mississippi to advance black voting rights during the 1964 Freedom Summer [US State Department information] when they were killed. Killen had not posted bond as of early Friday afternoon. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Democrats renew call for Roberts DOJ documents
Jeannie Shawl on August 12, 2005 2:51 PM ET

[JURIST] All eight Democratic members of the US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] sent a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales Friday, asking him to reconsider his decision not to release documents [JURIST report] written by US Supreme Court nominee John Roberts [JURIST news archive] while he was deputy Solicitor General. In their letter [text], the Democrats argue that the requested documents are not privileged and that they should be released because Roberts was a political appointee, making high-level policy decisions: These documents were prepared by attorneys in the OSG acting for the American people. We are requesting them for use by the Senate in the exercise of the Senate's explicit constitutional responsibility, and they are therefore not subject to the attorney client privilege. ... Indeed, former Senator Fred Thompson, who is helping the White House with this nomination, previously said of the attorney-client privilege that, "[i]n case after case, the courts have concluded that allowing it to be used against Congress would be an impediment to Congress' obligation and duty to get to the truth and carry out its investigative and oversight responsibilities." ...
It is instructive to look at the reasoning of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, when that court declined in 1998 to recognize the attorney-client privilege claim of Deputy White House Counsel Bruce Lindsey. The Court emphasized that even the most sensitive conversations between the President and his top advisors may have to be revealed to a grand jury, and the Court further stated that conversations with legal advisers should be treated no differently:
Only a certain conceit among those admitted to the bar could explain why legal advice should be on a higher plane than advice about policy, or politics, or why a President's conversation with the most junior lawyer in the White House ... is deserving of more protection from disclosure in a grand jury investigation than a President's discussions with ... a Cabinet Secretary [W]e do not believe lawyers are more important to the operations of government than all other officials, or that the advice lawyers render is more crucial to the functioning of the Presidency than the advice coming from all other quarters. ... [I]t would be contrary to tradition, common understanding, and our governmental system for the attorney-client privilege to attach to White House Counsel in the same manner as private counsel. In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1273, 1278 (D.C. Cir. 1998).
This case makes clear that documents from the White House Counsel's office are not subject to the attorney-client privilege; as to the documents at issue here arising from the OSG, which represents the American people rather than the President specifically, the inapplicability of any privilege is even clearer. ...
You stated in your letter last Friday that OSG documents must be kept confidential in order to protect the free flow of ideas among attorneys within the office. It is important to note, however, that Judge Roberts was not a career attorney within that office. He was a political appointee in a leadership position, politically responsible for making high-level policy decisions. As such, he could not have expected, nor was he entitled to, any confidentiality protection that some argue should apply to the advice of career staff attorneys. ... The Senators also note that the Department of Justice has released similar documents for past Supreme Court nominees, including Robert Bork and current Chief Justice William Rehnquist. Reuters has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal appeals court reinstates e-mail wiretap case
Krista-Ann Staley on August 12, 2005 10:15 AM ET

[JURIST] The US First Circuit Court of Appeals held [PDF opinion] Thursday that the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) [text], which updated the Wiretap Act [text] to include electronic communications, should be broadly interpreted to allow an e-mail provider alleged to have read correspondence in transit to customers to be tried on federal charges. The federal government filed suit [Electronic Privacy Information Center backgrounder] against Bradford Councilman, former Vice President of online bookseller Interloc which is now part of Alibris [corporate website], alleging the defendant provided customers with e-mail addresses and then directed employees to write code that would save and copy inbound communications from Amazon.com to those addresses before they were delivered. A three-judge panel narrowly interpreted the ECPA last year, ruling that the act was not violated [PDF opinion] in the instant case because one cannot "intercept" [statutory definition] e-mails, as prohibited by law, when they are in "electronic storage" [statutory definition]. Thursday's 5-2 opinion vacated the earlier panel decision, holding instead that "'electronic communication' includes transient electronic storage that is intrinsic to the communication process, and hence that interception of an e-mail message in such storage is an offense under the Wiretap Act." CNET News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UK plans to instruct judges on anti-terror deportations, bars radical cleric
Tom Henry on August 12, 2005 9:41 AM ET

[JURIST] Lord Charles Falconer [official profile], Secretary of State and Lord Chancellor in Tony Blairs Labour government, said Friday in an interview [recorded audio] with BBC Radio that judges could be given explicit legislative guidance [BBC report] on how to interpret the UK's Human Rights Act in order to guarantee that efforts to deport foreign nationals considered a threat to national security will not be blocked by judges. His comments cam after police detained 10 people [JURIST report] on Thursday, including Abu Qatada, the alleged spiritual leader of al Qaeda in Europe, and vowed to deport them. Judges have disrupted past government efforts to deport foreign nationals saying that the European Convention on Human Rights [PDF text], adopted in Britains 1998 Human Rights Act [text], guarantees deportees freedom from torture. Falconer said Friday that the "rights of the individual deportee [must be weighed] against the risks of national security." Reuters has more. The Guardian has local coverage.
Also on Friday, Britain blocked radical Islamist Omar Bakri Mohammed [BBC profile], a UK resident for 20 years, from re-entering the country, saying his presence was no longer "conducive to the public good." Earlier this week, Bakri fled to Lebanon [JURIST report] after an investigation was opened into his alleged praise of the London bombers and an alleged statement that Bakri would not reveal future information he learned about plans for future terrorist attacks. Bakri was detained by Lebanese police [JURIST report] Thursday for undisclosed reasons, but was released from custody Friday. BBC News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|