New anti-terrorism law called for in India after attack on religious site

[JURIST] Indian opposition leader Lal Krishna Advani [BBC profile] criticized the Indian government Friday for repealing the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) [text], saying that such legislation was necessary to prevent incidents like a Tuesday attack on a religious site in northern India [BBC report] that is disputed between Hindus and Muslims [BBC backgrounder]. In a move that was welcomed by human rights groups [Human Rights Watch press release], the Indian Parliament last year approved the repeal of the bill [The Hindu report], which had been adopted soon after 9/11 and had broadened the scope of the death penalty and the state's ability to detain and interrogate suspects. Responding for the Indian government, Union Home Minister Shivraj Patil [Wikipedia profile] stated "We do not want a draconian law like POTA. On the other hand, we are clear that terrorist activities also have to be curbed, controlled and contained. We have to strike a balance." According to Advani, "A special law is required to deal with terrorism" and "The only country where the government has removed [such a law] is India." BBC News has more.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.