 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, June 30, 2005 |
 |
|


UN commission finalizes reparations for victims of 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait
Holly Manges Jones on June 30, 2005 8:59 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN Compensation Committee [official website] approved the final claims [press release] from victims of the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait [BBC backgrounder] Thursday, bringing the total award payments to $52.5 billion. The panel, which consists of the fifteen permanent members of the UN Security Council [official website], made awards Thursday to the governments of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, and Jordan totaling over $366 million. The commission has processed more than 2.68 million claims over the past twelve years, which were funded by five percent of Iraq's oil sales. The claims processing goal of the committee is finished, but the panel will continue to make payments in the amount of $200 million every three months. Individuals receive payments first over oil companies, which will be paid last. AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

House votes to cut funding for developments involving property seizures
Holly Manges Jones on June 30, 2005 7:03 PM ET

[JURIST] The US House of Representatives passed a measure Thursday which would cut federal funding for development projects that involve seizure of private property. The legislation approved 231-189 was proposed in response to last week's US Supreme Court ruling on eminent domain [JURIST report] and was inserted as an amendment to a spending bill [text] for the Treasury, Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development departments. Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) [official website] sponsored the bill and denounced the Supreme Court's eminent domain decision by saying, "Once again, the highest court in the land has shown its inability to interpret the Constitution and defend the liberties and freedoms our forefathers so desperately envisioned when they established our great nation." Reuters has more.
Meanwhile, members of both the House and Senate Thursday promised similar bills to pull funding from government projects where individual homeowners are forced to sell their property in order for strip malls or hotels to be built in their place. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-WI) [official website], chairman of the House Judiciary Committee [official website], and ranking minority member Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-MI) [official website] said they will propose the Private Property Rights Protection Act to combat eminent domain. Senators John Cornyn (R-TX) [official website] and Bill Nelson (D-FL) [official website] are also joining forces to introduce the Protection of Homes, Small Businesses and Private Property Act [text, PDF] which will limit eminent domain to "public use" situations rather than promote private economic development.
The debate over the high court's ruling [JURIST report] has nonetheless not been without its partisanship. Within the Wisconsin Congressional caucus, for example, Rep. Sensenbrenner has criticized the Supreme Court's ruling by saying it "has the potential of becoming the Dred Scott decision] of the 21st century" while fellow Wisconsan Rep. David Obey [official website], ranking Democrat of the House Appropriations Committee [official website] and a supporter of the eminent domain ruling, has reminded Congress of the "system of separation of powers." The Washington Post has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Suspected file-swappers arrested in worldwide sweep
Tom Henry on June 30, 2005 12:59 PM ET

[JURIST] The Dutch government said Thursday that police in more than a dozen countries have confiscated computers and made arrests in an illegal file-swapping sweep led by US authorities. The raids occurred Wednesday in the Netherlands, Australia, Israel, Germany, South-Korea, Norway, France, Sweden, Denmark, Russia, Poland, Canada and Hungary, said a spokeswoman for the Dutch Finance Ministry [official website; press release in Dutch]. Most of those arrested are suspected of infringing the copyright of films, software and video games. The raids come in the wake of a landmark US Supreme Court ruling [JURIST report; PDF opinion] Monday that Internet file-trading networks, including Grokster and Morpheus, can be held liable when users copy music, movies and other media without permission. Reuters has more.
3:45 PM ET - The US Justice Department has since issued this press release on "Operation Site Down", described as the culmination of three separate undercover investigations conducted by the FBI. In the past 24 hours, more than 70 searches were executed in the United States, and more than 20 overseas. Four individuals were arrested in the United States, and searches and/or arrests occurred in the following 10 countries: Canada, Israel, France, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal and Australia. At least eight major online distribution sites were dismantled, preventing tens of millions of further losses to the content industry. More than 120 leading members of the organized online piracy underground were identified by the investigation to date, and as the investigations continue, additional targets will be identified and pursued. .


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

AMD takes Intel antitrust case to Japan, public
David Shucosky on June 30, 2005 10:08 AM ET

[JURIST] Just days after filing a federal antitrust lawsuit [JURIST report] against rival Intel, Advanced Micro Designs (AMD) [corporate website] has filed two similar suits against Intel in Japan. The company announced [corporate press release] Thursday that its Japanese arm, AMD Japan, had made two claims in Tokyo High Court and Tokyo District Court against Intel KK [corporate website in Japanese], Intel's Japanese subsidiary. Japan's Fair Trade Commission [official website, English version] had previously warned [JURIST report] Intel of possible violations, and ruled in March [JFTC press release] that they violated antitrust laws by offering rebates [Reuters report] to companies that either limited or avoided AMD purchases.
On Wednesday, AMD also took the battle against Intel to the court of public opinion, running full-page ads in major newspapers nationwide and publishing an open letter on their litigation on their website. Attorneys not party to the case cited the advertising campaign as "unusual", some dismissing it as merely for "publicity purposes". The San Jose Mercury News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|