 |
|

Legal news from Friday, December 3, 2004 |
 |
|


Environmental brief ~ Australian minister calls for greenhouse gas regulation
Tom Henry on December 3, 2004 6:15 PM ET

[JURIST] In Friday's environmental law news, John Thwaites, Minister of the Environment for the state of Victoria in Australia, has announced that he will be calling on the national Environment and Heritage Protection Council (EHPC) to adopt a plan that would require large emitters to report their greenhouse gas emissions annually. Currently, emitters have to report the emission of gasses listed on the National Pollutant Inventory (NPI) in accordance with a set of regulations adopted by the EHPC. The EHPC had considered adding greenhouse gasses to the NPI last April, but have not yet taken any action. The Australian has more....
In other news, Sri Lanka Environment and Natural Resources Minister A.H.M. Fowzie has announced a plan that that would completely ban the use of vehicles that do not comply with new emissions standards. The New Vehicle Emissions standards are currently set to take effect on January 1, 2006. The Minister's plan to ban noncompliant vehicles will need to be approved by the full Cabinet before taking effect. The UN has background[PDF] on Sri Lanka vehicle emission policies. The Sri Lanka Daily News has more.... The Maine Board of Environmental Protection (BEP) on Thursday approved a plan that would adopt the California Zero Emission Vehicle program. If passed by the Maine legislature this winter, the program would require, starting in 2009, 6 percent of all vehicles sold in Maine to have the newest available emissions control technology (ie. clean-burning gasoline) and an additional 4 percent to have essentially zero emissions, as found in gas-electric hybid vehicles. Critics of the plan point out that it may be difficult to comply with the program in Maine, where trucks make up 60 percent of the vehicles sold each year. The Bangor Daily News has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Bush signs disabilities education bill
Bernard Hibbitts on December 3, 2004 2:11 PM ET

[JURIST] President Bush Friday signed into law H.R. 1350, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 [PDF] (IDEA), designed among other things to ensure that students with disabilities will have special education teachers with the skills and training to teach special education and their subject area. The President's remarks at this morning's signing are online from the White House here. More information on the IDEA legislation, including the Congressional conference committee report, is available from the Council for Exceptional Children. In the wake of IDEA's passage, however, the Council sharply critized Congress for in fact appropriating $1.7 billion less for special education than it had initially promised: Congress's actions will exacerbate the funding shortfalls--and the fallout from inadequate funding--schools and districts already face, such as a shortage of licensed special educators to teach children with disabilities and the strain placed on local communities and states as they struggle to pay the balance of special education costs.
Congress also failed to appropriate additional dollars for gifted programs, which are essential for the educational progress and wellbeing of students with gifts and talents. Without adequate funding districts are unable to provide comprehensive gifted education services for students, or their programs are disbanded entirely.
Read the full CEC press release here.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Supreme Court takes broadband access case
Bernard Hibbitts on December 3, 2004 1:37 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court announced at midday Friday that it would hear appeals from the Federal Communications Commission and the cable industry on whether broadband services that offer computer users high-speed links to the Internet via cable are an "information service" subject to minimal regulation by federal or local authorities or whether, following lower court rulings, they constitute a telecommunications service, a finding that would require a cable operator to open its facilities to all Internet Service Providers, not just its own. The cases are FCC v. Brand X and National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. Brand X. The certiorari order is here [PDF]. The NCTA has issued a press release welcoming the order here, saying that Establishing a deregulatory environment for cable modem service is critical to the universal deployment in the U.S. of broadband services, including emerging services such as Voice over Internet Protocol service. This case presents a fundamental question of communications law, carefully decided by the FCC and then overturned by a circuit court that simply ignored what the agency had done, refusing to accord the FCC the deference Supreme Court precedent requires. Classifying cable modem service as an interstate information service, as the FCC did, puts this innovative service on the right deregulatory path
FCC Chairman Michael Powell said in his own statement: "High-speed Internet connections are not telephones, and Im glad the Supreme Court has agreed to review the 9th Circuits ruling that they are. The 9th Circuit's decision would have grave consequences for the future and availability of high-speed Internet connections in this country." AP has more.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

BREAKING NEWS ~ Ukraine Supreme Court invalidates poll, orders new vote
Bernard Hibbitts on December 3, 2004 11:14 AM ET

[JURIST] BBC News is reporting that the Ukrainian Supreme Court has invalidated the disputed presidential election poll and ordered fresh elections.
11:21 AM ET - Ukraine Channel 5 is broadcasting live video from Kyiv of crowds in the main square celebrating the ruling. They can be heard to chant "Yushchenko", the name of the opposition leader who made the fraud claim.
11:28 AM ET - Live webcam shots of crowds gathered in Kyiv's Independence Square are here, courtesy Kyiv's 1Plus1-TV. From Kyiv, the Maidan civic activist website now reports in English: Actions and inactions of Central Electoral Committee were declared to be illegal since they contradict to plenty of articles of the Law about presidential elections.
The Court has cancelled CEC decisions No. 12-64 and 12-65 (about declaring of the President of Ukraine and declaring or election results).
The Court decided that the re-run should be held within 3 weeks according to the Article 85 of the Law about presidential elections.
People scan Yushchenko in the hall. Read the original post here.
11:35 AM ET - Kyiv-based US lawyer Scott Clark was watching TV and adds these observations on his Foreign Notes weblog:The head justice [JURIST editor's note: presiding judge Anatoliy Yarema] read the opinion and he was noticeably nervous reading it out. This is the judge who had no trouble at all during any of the hearings. He was forceful and no nonsense. But while reading this opinion, his voice quavered and he cleared his throat a number of times. I can only imagine the pressure these people were under. But these justices deserve credit for this. It was a unanimous vote. Full post here.
11:57 AM ET - The Kyiv Post now has a full story in English here. Excerpts:Tens of thousands of opposition protesters who had massed in central Independence Square (Maidan Nezalezhnosti) in anticipation of the decision cheered, waving blue-and-yellow Ukrainian and orange Yushchenko flags and chanting "Yushchenko! Yushchenko!" The crackle of fireworks could be heard in the distance.
Yushchenko's lawyers in court were jubilant.
"This is a great victory of all people who have been standing at the square, a great victory for Ukrainian democracy," said Mykola Katerinchuk, the Yushchenko lawyer who wrote the appeal....
Representatives from Yanukovych and the Central Election Commission (CEC) left the courthouse before the judges announced their decision....
In its ruling, the court slammed Ukraine's CEC, citing massive lapses by the government in the run-up to the election and in the vote counting that followed.
Particular attention was paid in the ruling to the numerous documented cases of fraud brought by the opposition. Among them were the improper transportation and handling of ballots; improperly or inadequately compiled voters lists; abuse of administrative resources in favor of the government-backed candidate, and lack of equal media access for both candidates. JURIST will post the full text of the Court's ruling as soon as it becomes available in either Ukrainian or English.
12:36 PM ET - The Yushchenko campaign has issued an English-language release on the Supreme Court ruling here, noting that "almost all of the claims lodged by Victor Yushchenkos representative Mykola Katerynchuk were satisfied"; the release also notes that under the Supreme Court's decision a new round of campaign will start on December 5 with a new run-off election December 26.
1:11 PM ET - JURIST's Monitor legal video service has posted recorded video of the reading of the full Ukrainian Supreme Court ruling here, via Kyiv Channel 5 (in Ukrainian). The reading takes about 2 minutes, and applause in the chamber can be heard immediately afterwards.
10:10 PM ET - BBC News has posted translated excerpts from the Ukraine Supreme Court ruling in English. The court declared:Taking into consideration the impossibility of being able to establish, in a reliable manner, the will of voters in the single nationwide seat by drawing up the results of the election run-off, and taking into account that the election run-off held on 21 November 2004 did not change the status of the candidates who, in accordance with the results of the election on 31 October obtained the most votes, the court regards it necessary to renew the rights of the subjects of the electoral process by holding a run-off in line with the rights accorded by Article 85 of the law of Ukraine on the presidential election. Read more of the ruling.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|