| JURIST Search: "odah" | |
| Searching the JURIST archive... |  |
|
 |
|
Kuwait lawyer sues government officials for release of Guantanamo detainees
July 18, 2012 by Dan Taglioli
A Kuwaiti lawyer announced Tuesday that he has filed a lawsuit against Kuwait's prime minister and other government officials in order to pressure authorities to facilitate the release of two Kuwaiti detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Lawyer Adel Abdulhadi is seeking the release of Faiz Mohammed Ahmed.... [more]
Supreme Court ruled Guantanamo detainees have habeas corpus rights [this day at law]
June 12, 2011 by Clay Flaherty
On June 12, 2008, the US Supreme Court held in the consolidated cases of Boumediene v. Bush and Al-Odah v. United States that federal courts have jurisdiction to review habeas corpus petitions filed by Guantanamo Bay detainees who have been classified as "enemy combatants." The ruling overturned.... [more]
Guantanamo detainee appeals to Supreme Court for habeas relief
September 30, 2010 by Andrea Bottorff
Kuwaiti Guantanamo Bay detainee Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad al Odah on Tuesday petitioned the US Supreme Court to reverse a federal appeals court decision that denied him habeas corpus relief. In his petition for writ of certiorari, al Odah claims that the lower courts violated his right to due.... [more]
Federal appeals court denies Guantanamo detainee al Odah's habeas petition
July 8, 2010 by Hillary Stemple
The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit released a partially redacted opinion Wednesday denying habeas corpus relief to Guantanamo Bay detainee Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al Odah. In its opinion, the court affirmed the district court's ruling that there was sufficient.... [more]
Federal judge denies Al Odah Guantanamo petition
September 1, 2009 by Jaclyn Belczyk
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the US District Court for the District of Columbia denied the habeas corpus petition of Guantanamo Bay detainee Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al Odah in a partially redacted opinion made public Monday. Kollar-Kelly denied Al Odah's habeas petition last week, finding....... [more]
Khadr hearing going ahead after Supreme Court ruling: US military judge
June 14, 2008 by Benjamin Klein
A US military commission pre-trial hearing for Canadian Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr will go ahead Wednesday as planned notwithstanding Thursday's Supreme Court ruling on detainee habeas rights, military judge Col. Patrick Parrish ruled Friday. Khadr defense attorney Navy Lt. Cmdr. William Ku....... [more]
Supreme Court rules Guantanamo detainees have habeas corpus privilege
June 12, 2008 by Mike Rosen-Molina
The US Supreme Court held in the consolidated cases of Boumediene v. Bush and Al-Odah v. United States Thursday that federal courts have jurisdiction to review habeas corpus petitions filed by Guantanamo detainees who have been classified as enemy combatants. Overturning a decision by th....... [more]
US military judge postpones Hamdan military commission trial
May 16, 2008 by Mike Rosen-Molina
A military judge Friday delayed the military commission trial of Yemeni Guantanamo Bay detainee Salim Ahmed Hamdan until July. On Thursday, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit rejected a bid by Hamdan to postpone the start of his military commission until the Supreme Court rules in the.... [more]
The Supreme Court ponders habeas rights for Guantanamo prisoners [comment]
December 6, 2007 by Andrew Wood
J. Wells Dixon: The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) returned to the United States Supreme Court yesterday for arguments in Al Odah v. United States and Boumediene v. Bush, which will likely decide the fate of about 300 men held without charge or trial in Guantanamo Bay. At stake are q....... [more]
Supreme Court weighs Guantanamo habeas cases
December 5, 2007 by Jeannie Shawl
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in the consolidated cases of Boumediene v. Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. United States (06-1196) on whether detainees at Guantanamo Bay should be allowed to challenge their detentions in federal court. The Court is considering whether the.... [more]
|
|
|
|