JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

JURIST Search: "HTC"
Searching the JURIST archive...Search term news feed

Federal judge orders Apple to reveal details of HTC settlement
November 22, 2012 by Blake Lynch
A federal judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California on Wednesday ordered Apple to disclose a full copy of its settlement agreement with HTC to Samsung Electronics. HTC and Apple announced earlier this month that they had reached a global settlement dismissing all.... [more]

Apple, HTC reach patent settlement
November 11, 2012 by Cynthia Miley
HTC and Apple announced Saturday that they have reached a global settlement dismissing all patent lawsuits between the parties. The conflict between the two companies arose after Apple initially filed suit against HTC in the US District Court for the District of Delaware in March 2010 alleging.... [more]

USITC ruled HTC infringed two Apple patents [this day at law]
July 16, 2012 by Garrett Eisenhour
On July 16, 2010, the US International Trade Commission (USITC) ruled that HTC infringed Apple's patents after the company filed a complaint against Apple relating to cell phones using Android operating systems. A year prior, Apple had filed suits against HTC alleging patent infringement in the US.... [more]

Apple successful in barring HTC from using patents in lawsuit
June 12, 2012 by Sung Un Kim
The US International Trade Commission (USITC) ruled on Monday that HTC could not use five patents that it obtained from Google last August in its case against Apple. Apple had argued that HTC did not obtain all necessary rights to the intellectual property from Google. The patents were.... [more]

US trade commission rules narrowly for Apple in HTC patent case
December 20, 2011 by Michael Haggerson
The US International Trade Commission (USITC) ruled on Monday for Apple on a patent complaint against HTC for infringing its "data tapping" patents. The USITC found that HTC had violated section 337 of the Tarriff Act of 1930 by infringing on some of the claims of patent nos. 5,946,647, 6,343,263,.... [more]

US trade commission clears Apple in HTC patent case
November 22, 2011 by Jamie Reese
The US International Trade Commission (USITC) ruled Monday for Apple on a patent complaint brought by HTC. The USITC found that Apple had not violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by reasons of infringement of Patent Nos. 6,658,146, 6,683,978, 6,775,417 and 7,043,087. These patents.... [more]

Apple sued Motorola for touchscreen patent infringement [this day at law]
October 29, 2011 by Cody Harding
On October 29, 2010, Apple filed two lawsuits against rival smartphone manufacturer Motorola, alleging that several of Motorola's products infringed upon six patents owned by Apple that related to touchscreen technology. The lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the Western District of.... [more]

HTC sues Apple for three new counts of patent infringement
August 17, 2011 by Julia Zebley
HTC filed three new patent complaints against Apple on Tuesday through the US International Trade Commission (USITC), the latest in a series of suits filed back and forth between the two companies. Patents 7,765,414; 7,672,219 and 7,417,944 are at issue, all dealing with various functions of.... [more]

US trade commission to probe Apple infringement claim against HTC
August 9, 2011 by Chris Morris
The US International Trade Commission (USITC) announced Monday that it will investigate a claim made last month by Apple that HTC committed patent infringement related to touchscreen and scrolling features. Alleging that HTC violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing copyrighted.... [more]

USITC rules HTC infringed two Apple patents; HTC will appeal
July 17, 2011 by Julia Zebley
Apple prevailed in a complaint against HTC on Saturday when the US International Trade Commission (USITC) ruled against HTC for patent infringement on patents 5,946,647 and 6,343,263, both of which relate to cell phones that run the Android operating system (OS). HTC will appeal the ruling. If.... [more]



next page »