Arizona insanity defense ruling [US SC]

Clark v. Arizona, Supreme Court of the United States, June 29, 2006 [upholding Arizona's law governing insanity defenses in criminal cases, ruling that the state's approach does not violate constitutional due process]. Read the Court's majority opinion per Justice Souter, along with a concurrence in part and dissent in part from Justice Breyer, and a dissent from Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Stevens and Ginsburg. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.

Opinions expressed in JURIST Commentary are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST's editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh.

Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.