JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

 US Immigration Law

On April 25, 2012, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Arizona v. United States. By June 2012, the Court will decide the legal fate of Arizona's highly controversial immigration laws, more commonly referred to as SB 1070. The Arizona law has caused a nationwide controversy that implicates areas of international relations and public policy, and underscores tensions between state and federal governments. While the case will have an immediate effect on only the Arizona legislation, it has served as a flashpoint for the modern debate over immigration regulation in the US. A lack of comprehensive federal reform has prompted many states, including Arizona, to pass legislation that purports to enforce federal immigration law. Such laws have sought to grant state law enforcement officials expanded powers to identify potential undocumented immigrants, have made it a crime to fail to provide documentation of immigration status, and have attempted to make it more difficult for employers to hire resident aliens and undocumented immigrants. Proponents argue that these measures are required to fully address the growing problem of undocumented immigrants, while opponents have argued that these legislative measures lend legitimacy to open ethnic discrimination.... [more]

  TIMELINE

5/21/2013: Senate Judiciary Committee approved immigration reform bill

4/29/2013: Colorado governor signed immigrant tuition bill

4/29/2013: Supreme Court denied Alabama immigration appeal

4/16/2013: US Senators unveiled immigration reform bill

4/2/2013: Oregon governor signed tuition bill for undocumented immigrants

3/31/2013: Bipartisan US senate group reached agreement on immigration reform

3/29/2013: Federal judge struck down part of Indiana immigration law

...[more]
  ACADEMIC COMMENTARY
Forum: Recognizing the Role of Discretion in the Immigration System
Forum: Arizona v. US and Obama's Deferred Action Policy
Forum: SB 1070 and the Impending Police State
  LEGAL PROFESSIONAL COMMENTARY
Hotline: Truly Comprehensive Immigration Reform Must Address LGBT Issues
Hotline: The Invisible Problem of Immigration Detention
Hotline: Unchecked Power Granted by House Bill 87
  STUDENT COMMENTARY
Dateline: 'Deferred Action' Immigration Policy: Bold, But Insufficient
Dateline: Federal Law Preempts Only Two Provisions of Arizona Immigration Law
Dateline: Remembering the Purpose of the VAWA: Protecting Abused Immigrants